UO Dining “Staffing Shortage” Reflects Poor Wages

Visit any dining hall on campus this fall and you’re liable to find a sign proclaiming decreased hours, slashed services, missing menu items or temporary closures—all “due to a staffing shortage.” This is certainly disappointing for many students who enjoy certain dishes or like to get a late night snack, but it’s also revealing of a bigger problem with the way University Dining is framing this issue and their relationship to the campus community generally; a problem that (like so many) has its roots in capitalism.

UO Dining primarily profits not by selling individual meals, but by selling meal plans. These guarantee access to specific amounts of food across the halls for a set rate, are typically purchased at the start of the term, and are generally required for students living on campus. These factors mean that most students are accessing dining halls as their primary food source, and are not at liberty to change that.

As such, UO is under an obligation to provide the services, including full hours and consistent quality options for diverse diets, that were promised when students bought their meal plans. They seem to be aware of at least this much—thus, the apologetic signs. However, what they’re missing, or else refusing to acknowledge, is that their “staffing shortage” is their fault.

UO Dining seems very intent on shifting the blame for being short staffed to the myriad students choosing not to work there. “We’re hiring!”, their signs proclaim, “Ask your server for a card with the handshake link.” They’re even offering “up to $250 in incentives” for new hires who stay until December. So why doesn’t anyone want to work, they seem to be wondering. 

Why the staffing shortage?

Well, what their signs don’t say is that their starting wage is a measly $13.25 an hour—barely over minimum wage. And the job posting doesn’t say anything about a raise anytime soon. The benefits listed on Handshake are a discounted meal—not even free, discounted—each day of work and the practically insulting vaguery “opportunity for advancement and development.” Advancement to where, I wonder? Development of what?

What UO Dining must understand is what anyone who’s taken an economics class can tell them: $13.25 isn’t enough for the labor they’re trying to purchase. How can we tell? Simple—people aren’t filling the positions. To fill these roles—which they are obliged to do because they’ve already agreed to offer these services—UO Dining has to be competitive, and these wages are laughably uncompetitive. In today’s labor environment, you simply cannot get away with paying that close to minimum wage for that kind of work, especially with no benefits to speak of.

This is far from the only case of businesses crying “nobody wants to work”, and every time, it’s because they pay shit wages and are shitty to work for. UO Dining shouldn’t be apologizing for being short staffed. They should be boosting their wages, expanding their benefits and improving their work environments (including covid safety), to recruit, retain and fairly treat enough employees to actually provide the services students have paid for.

The Solution

Unfortunately, history shows us that they won’t likely do this of their own accord. If they can get away with just cutting back on services permanently while charging increasingly more each year, they will do so. And complaining in Student Insurgent op-eds won’t do much, so what’s a student worker to do? Rhetorical question, of course: the answer is STRIKE!

An organized coalition of campus dining workers going on strike for a single day could almost certainly raise wages by a few dollars at least, and a week could secure almost any benefits the university could offer. We should ignore anti-unionization rules and rhetoric, and look to the wider labor movement sweeping the country for comradery. If UO Dining won’t compensate us fairly for our labor, why should we let them take it?

Day of Demands: Ducks Demand Democracy

…and power dynamics that dominate campus. Cops Off Campus (formerly Disarm UO), Democratize UO, UO YDSA, and the ROAR center advocated for student autonomy, democratic (and community based) elections of…

Time to Strike: Democratize the Board

…troubling, the Labor Education and Research Center, an essential resource for the very unions who work on this campus and Oregon workers at large, were dealt a debilitating 45% cut…

East-campus Housing Mold

…up, thus yielding less than rent. Meanwhile, multiple construction projects on campus have built new facilities, amenities and luxuries all over campus during the past several months. A lawsuit filed…

Monthly Labor Column: December

…members voting and 93% of voters voting yes. Matthew Osborn-Grosso is a community organizer and writes a weekly newsletter with a focus on labor that can be found at solidarity.substack.com….

GTFF Speaks Out Against UO’s Back to School Protocols

…classes on campus:Proper on-campus protectionSufficient HEPA filters in every classroom, office, & labOnly holding classes in rooms with sufficient ventilationN95s for every student and how to wear them (they already…

Angela Davis Is Coming To Campus

…activism, and second wave feminist movements, continues with her contemporary activism. Friday April 30th, 4-6pm. Located at the University of Oregon campus in Straub Hall room 156. View campus map…

Vivian Day Care Responds to Staff COVID Safety Concerns

Teachers at the Vivian Olum Child Development Center were awarded a pay-raise and shorter work hours after weeks-long negotiations with administrative staff at the Center and UO Campus Services administration….

Oregon University Employees Vote to Strike

…committed to maintaining campus operations with as little disruption as possible”. They will prioritize essential campus operations such as housing, dining, security, and classes. The SEIU 503 Union represents over…

Graduate Employees Continue Fight for Fair Contract

…graduate employees or other workers on campus. By failing to value graduate employees, who taught 17 percent of lectures, 83 percent of labs, and 93 percent of discussion sections in…

Reclaim UO update

campus, in the Eugene/Springfield community, and at the State Capitol in Salem. Our message resonated deeply with UO students, faculty, staff, and community members who see the effects that the…

There is Power in a Union: A Case for the Unionization of University Housing

…us to drastically improve the conditions under which we labor. An organization which allows any one of us to sit down at a bargaining table with the bosses and know…

GTFF Resists UO Admin to Secure Contract and Readies for Broader Struggle

…threat demonstrated through a massive 95 percent strike authorization vote among GTFF members. The campaign involved on-campus solidarity with undergraduate students and unionized staff and faculty, which was bolstered by…

Chairman Chuck Lillis Assaults Protesters Before Trustees Meeting

…opinion known in protest. With medical coveralls, surgical masks, and standing together, you could read across the protester’s torsos in stenciled spray paint, “CAMPUS CLOSED.” The intent in their actions…